Most leads do not have a case
80% of "medical malpractice" inquiries are bad outcomes, not negligence. Sorting signal from noise takes attorney hours per lead — and missing the 20% with real cases costs you 7-figure settlements.
Med-mal is high-stakes, high-cost litigation. One bad case burns 18 months of attorney time. GavelGrow deep intake, statute-tracking, and pre-screen workflows filter leads down to the cases actually worth pursuing — and track every $500K+ settlement back to its marketing source.
80% of "medical malpractice" inquiries are bad outcomes, not negligence. Sorting signal from noise takes attorney hours per lead — and missing the 20% with real cases costs you 7-figure settlements.
Med-mal statutes vary by state, injury type, and discovery rule. A lead who calls 23 months after a botched surgery in a 2-year-SOL state needs triaged TODAY, not next week.
Every viable case needs $2-5K in expert medical review before you file. Taking on cases that should not pass review burns thousands per bad lead. Pre-screen matters.
Pre-built intake asks provider name, facility, date of incident, specific procedure, injury type, current treatment, and prior medical history. Enough detail to pre-screen without attorney time.
Based on incident date + state + injury type, every lead shows days-remaining until the statute of limitations. Urgent flags auto-route to partners for same-day callback when within 60 days.
Intake scores each lead on likely viability (missed diagnosis, surgical error, medication error, birth injury, etc.). Only leads scoring 70%+ get routed for attorney review and expert consult.
Track settlements and verdicts back to the exact campaign that generated the lead. See which Google Ads keywords produced $3M settlements and which produced $15K nuisance cases. Budget accordingly.
$155 Avg. CPL (mid-market med-mal). Top 10% of med-mal firms run at $78 CPL. High CPLs are expected — but if your CPL is $300 with a 3% sign rate, it is not working.
Intake questions map to a viability rubric (provider type, documented injury, treatment gap, prior complications). Each answer carries a weighted score — the total determines routing. Attorneys review the rubric and can adjust weights per practice style. Scoring is always advisory, never automatic rejection.
Yes. Each case type gets its own intake template with the right medical questions. Dashboard segments by injury type so you can see which case types generate the highest-value settlements for your firm specifically.
Medical record collection stays in your existing workflow (HIPAA release forms, requests to hospitals, etc.). GavelGrow tracks the request status as a task per case. Direct medical record retrieval integrations (ChartSquad, etc.) are on the product roadmap.
Yes. When a case does not meet your firm criteria, you can mark it "Referred Out" and assign to another firm in your network. Track referral-out revenue separately so you know which referring relationships actually pay off.
See pricing · Request a custom growth plan · Book a 15-minute walkthrough